The Risk Inventory and Strengths Evaluation (RISE) assessment involves identifying a young individual’s’ risky behaviors and key strengths, allowing them to improve their lives through a well-informed intervention plan. in order to replace poor decision making with the recognition of improvement opportunities.
The earlier one can detect risky behaviors and learn to use their strengths, the easier it is better the chances to overcome adversity. Adaptation as an adult will be more natural possible if they can correct their negative behavior nowearly.
The RISE assessment can provide children with mental health problems the tools they need to increase resilience to outside influences and decrease vulnerability to environmental triggers, helping them adapt to social situations and understand how they can move forward and function with their illness challenges.
In order to validate any assessment, you need to know whether it actually measures what it claims to measure. RISE validity is evidenced in content validity, structural validity, concurrent validity, and evidence based on the results of clinical groups. By using summary scales and subscales, RISE validity can be determined in many different areas.
The content validity of the RISE assessment comes from detailed coverage of the behaviors and psychological characteristics that the rating scale measures. The risky behaviors and key strengths that the assessment is supposed to identify should be described sufficiently so they can be rated and validated.
RISE organizes items into scales that measure different aspects of the assessment. areas; tThe structural validity can be examined using several different methods of determining whether the elements of the assessment share variances in the underlying dataset and support separate interpretation of their scores.
Concurrent validity is determined by whether or not the relationship between the assessment’s scores and those from existing measures of similar constructs demonstrate theoretical expectations. For instance, proneness to risky behavior usually shows problems inof psychological adjustment. The concurrent validity of the assessment can be measured by determining the correlation between these two factors.
Evidence Based on Clinical Groups
The validity of RISE is supported by studies that have shown its scores differentiating samples of youth that is developing normally with samples of children and young adults suffering from various clinical syndromes involved in high-risk behavior.
The Use of Summary Scales and Subscales
RISE uses summary scales and subscales to determine these validity factors. When exploratory factor analysis is applied to the completed assessment forms using summary scales, it validates the structure of the assessment itself. Consistent patterns in scores across all RISE forms show little variance, confirming its effectiveness in testing for risky behavior and psychological strengths.
The RISE subscales include risk subscales like bullying, aggression, delinquency, eating problems, sleeping problems, sexual risk, substance abuse, suicide, and self-harm. While summary scales are based on theoretical distinctions between risky behavior and psychological strengths, the subscales have a rational basis in matching item content with scale domain.
By thoroughly testing the consistency of summary scores and subscales across different groups of youth, the RISE validity can be established. For more information on the Risk Inventory and Strengths Evaluation, visit WPS Publish.